Wonder Woman 1984 has three major points： the wishing stone is simple and rude, and the century reconciliation is even more ridiculous.

I was conquered by Wonder Woman who brought his own bgm and slow-motion special effects. I sat in the cinema with great expectation (now the cinema also has its own massage chair, which is amazing). I spent two hours in an uneasy mood transition from expectation to frustration to disappointment.

When I walked out of the screening hall, I was once silent, and my mind kept flashing, but I was unable to vomit. Finally, I could only give a sigh: Hey, how did the woman become like this?

First of all, the wishing stone is not rigorous enough to explode when it is out of control. There is neither self-consistent operation logic nor traceable context. How to make it? What is the deep operation principle?

In the movie, we just say "gain and loss" and just pass it by, and expand the principle of unequal exchange. Compared with the interpretation of "value" in "The Alchemist of Steel", it’s just a joke. Semi-finished products with unclear basic settings can also be used as villains, just like jokes.

For example, if two people wish to be the strongest person in the world at the same time, and both of them have come true, then there is no strongest person. Then this wish can’t be realized. Since it can’t be realized, how can we make an exchange?

The rules for the use of the wishing stone were not given at the beginning, but were revealed one by one according to the plot. For example, a wish can come true, but the wishing person will be taken away something that originally belonged to him. What is this thing? The wishing person does not know it in advance.

Using this rule, most of the plots are promoted. wonder woman’s boyfriend Steve returns, which leads to the disappearance of her strength. The origin of the leopard girl is based on this, which is very convenient and lazy.

For another example, the villain wishes on the wishing stone and becomes a wishing stone? My direct boy, this operation is also simple and rude, without any explanation, and without any bedding, a stone has become a big living person. It is also dumbfounded, and I don’t know where to spit.

Finally, the order of the whole world was messed up, the US-Soviet war started, oil tycoons killed each other, and people hated each other and started riots. With such a powerful stone, the wish can be withdrawn. Just say "I withdraw my wish", everything will be restored, the missile will disappear, the dead will be resurrected, and the wishing stone will become a living person again. Don’t come to the story of the woman with this kind of props, okay?

Let’s talk about my beloved Amazon warrior, Xia Xia, who took off the aura of God in this story and completely became a woman next door. This is nothing. Since they are all positioned as romantic films, please let her be a woman next door and enjoy love. The woman next door doesn’t need to dismantle the armored car with her bare hands, fight with a lady who is jealous of her strength, or choose between her boyfriend and world peace.

Why should the screenwriter let the heroine bear the responsibility of being a hero, but at the same time, she can’t bear the sweetness of love. If this plot is put in a domestic drama, it is equivalent to asking the emperor whether you want a country or a beauty?

The answer to this question may be everyone’s own choice, but the setting of this question itself is too vulgar. It’s 2020. Can we stop discussing the problems hundreds of years ago? Even the "female" Xia is too out of date.

The heroine in everyone’s heart is different, but at least the heroine in my heart is strong and brave. She can sacrifice herself to give up love for justice. She did this many years ago, and I believe she will do it again many years later. Even if she really encounters such a dilemma in the movie, it is just an ordinary scar in her powerful heart.

After all, it is a so-called "big woman" movie, and the villain’s image also reflects the plight of universal men. The obsession with success and money, the belief from persistence to paranoia, and the final return due to family ties make the villain’s role too thin and routine, making the role just a symbol, greatly reducing the space for the audience to feel, and there is nothing to discuss further.

On the contrary, I think the leopard girl is a bright spot in this film. At least people have a transition process. The final leopard girl form at least makes me very satisfied with comic book fans, but it is really timid. Jumping all the way to cut wires, gorgeous sparks with lightning, and finally you are afraid of electricity!

Finally, I want to talk about the theme of the film. Although neither the story nor the sense of atmosphere has held up, I still agree with the theme that the film wants to express. The concept of "recycling desire" is to hope that we all have the power of "self-denial". Instead of wishing for something that doesn’t exist, it is safer to find good qualities that we have never found before, isn’t it?

Speaking of which, I have to strongly complain about the final reconciliation of the century in the film. I don’t believe you if you say that Chen Kaige didn’t participate in the production …

To borrow the original words of Professor Fudan from today, "People with weak spirit are always in turmoil." The Amazon women warriors in my heart believe in strength and strength. They are never weak, and their hearts are always firm. Text/Gao Xiaoxi & Two Fish