On September 10th, the second model of Jiyue Auto, Jiyue 07, was officially launched, and the preferential price for limited-time car purchase was 199,900-289,900 yuan (including 10,000 yuan limited-time cash reduction).

The ultra-Yue 07 is positioned as a medium-sized and large-sized pure electric coupe. Its body is built on the vast structure of Geely SEA, and it is produced in Geely Hangzhou Bay Smart Factory. The body data is 4953x1989x1480mm and the wheelbase is 3013mm.

Extreme Yue 07 adopts Geely chassis and Baidu technology (design, intelligent cabin and intelligent driving); There are quite a few models produced by the same factory as Extreme Yue 07, and the first pure electric model, the Z10, which has been listed soon, is obviously a big rival of Extreme Yue 07. In addition, as long as the body size is a "5×2×3m" pure electric car, it is inevitable to compete with Xiaomi SU7.

So, what is the competitiveness of Extreme Vietnam 07?

▍Extreme Yue 07 VS Lectra Z10: Extreme Yue 07 entry-level version can be considered, and Lectra Z10 entry-level version is not cost-effective.

In terms of price, the entry-level version of Extreme Yue 07 is 3,000 yuan more expensive than the Lingke Z10, and the acceleration of zero hundred is 0.1s slower, but the battery life is 60km(CLTC) longer.

Interestingly, the capacity of the entry-level version of the two cars is almost the same (71-degree Ferrous lithium phosphate), and the drag coefficient is almost the same (0.198). Even the kerb quality of the entry-level version of the Z10 is lighter than that of the Extreme Yue 07 (a difference of 42kg), but in terms of battery life, the LEICK Z10 is actually 60km worse.

If the above comparison is almost "fifty-fifty", then the difference between the two entry-level models is quite large from the perspective of intelligent cabin, intelligent driving configuration and brand tonality of the two.

Link brand has always been independent and high-endsportsBrand self-styled, but the 400V version of the Lectra Z10 adopts the first-generation 200kW rear-drive motor based on Geely SEA architecture. For consumers who like motion control, the performance of the Lectra Z10 is slightly insufficient (the 800V version of the Z10 is priced at 249, and it was upgraded to a 310kW rear-drive motor in 800 yuan).

Some people will say that it is indeed a fact that Extreme Yue 07 has not got the latest generation of 310kW rear-drive motor on the vast platform. However, the brand tonality of Extreme Yue is relatively more inclined to the forward-looking intelligent cabin design and the top domestic ones.ZhijiaSystem.

On the entry-level version of the Extreme Yue 07, all the intelligent driving hardware configurations that are exactly the same as those of the top model are equally equipped, including two NVIDIA Orion-X chips with a computing power of 508TOPS, and Baidu ASD Apollo high-order intelligent driving system consisting of five millimeter-wave radars and eleven cameras (including seven 8-megapixel high-definition cameras).

However, the sincerity of the smart driving hardware configuration of the two entry-level models of the Lectra Z10 is obviously insufficient, and the number of cameras outside the car has shrunk to only five.

Of course, if you want to fully experience the full-body Apollo intelligent driving of Class 07, you need to pay another 4999 yuan to buy out this set of NOA driving functions in urban areas; Of course, if you don’t consider buyout for the time being, Extreme Yue 07 can also provide quite excellent high-speed pilot-assisted driving.

In addition, in the comfort configuration of the vehicle, the Extreme Yue 07 is also slightly ahead. For example, the whole vehicle is equipped with two 50W mobile phone wireless charging positions, and the heating, ventilation and massage functions of the front seats and the heating and ventilation functions of the rear seats will also be presented in the first sale rights. On the Lexus Z10, only the top model with a price of 288,800 yuan can enjoy the front seat massage function.

To put it simply, the entry model of Extreme Yue 07 gives the longest board of the model; However, the entry-level model of the Lectra Z10 hides its longboard, which is the core reason why the author recommends the entry-level version of the Extreme Yue 07.

▍Extreme Yue 07 VS Xiaomi SU7: Extreme Yue 07 misplaces Xiaomi SU7, and its valence ratio is higher.

If there are more requirements for the endurance of the vehicle, it is recommended to add another 20,000 yuan budget and directly go to the long endurance version of 07.

The long-life version of Extreme Yue 07 is equipped with a 100kWh model, and the supplier is from Times Geely, which is a joint venture brand with Geely.

However, the electric architecture of the long battery life version of the Extreme Yue 07 is 400V, and the actual maximum charging speed is about 2C(200kW). Officially, the peak charging power of the 400V model of the Extreme Yue 07 is 240kW, that is to say, in theory, it takes 20 minutes at the earliest to charge 80 degrees of electricity, and then it takes more than half an hour or 35 minutes according to the real-time power and the peak power discount.

Extreme Yue 07 used some care here, so this battery can’t actually be regarded as a "complete" Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited Kirin ternary lithium battery, but the advantage is that the price is more affordable. Is it worth it to wait 15 minutes to charge it and replace it with a Ningde 100-degree battery with less than 220,000? Consumers have the final say.

In terms of other configurations, the configuration of the long-life version of the Extreme Yue 07 is almost exactly the same as that of the entry-level version, including the 200kW rear-drive motor (the acceleration of the long-life version is slightly improved to 6.5s), as well as the intelligent cabin and intelligent driving of the vehicle.

Compared with the ultra-long battery life version of Xiaomi SU7, in fact, the Pro version of this SU7 is the price ratio among the three configuration models of Xiaomi SU7.minimumThe model of.

Downward, there are 215,900 entry-level models, with 299,900 "heart-to-heart" appearance, excellent chassis adjustment and Xiaomi intelligent cabin can be enjoyed, and CLTC battery life has reached 700km；; The 299,900 Max version has various top-level configurations of "silent seconds", including the 800V platform and the top-level handling performance at the same level.

At the moment when Xiaomi Zhijia has not yet emerged, it is a very smart choice for Extreme Yue 07 to "misplace" the 250,000 yuan range model with relatively weak competitiveness of Xiaomi SU7 at a price of less than 220,000 yuan.

▍Write it at the end

Having said that, the Extreme Yue 07 is not a model that you can just enter with your eyes closed. She has a doorless design that many people may not accept, that is, there is really no doorknob, just use the button to open the door.

In addition, except for the two wheels on the steering wheel, almost all the physical buttons in the car are in the form of touch, including the shift operation of the vehicle (of course, it is very convenient to get started in practice, which accords with the intuition of forward and backward).

Moreover, as a coupe with such a loose line, some drivers may find it a bit difficult to control, and the so-called "you can look at it from a distance without being ridiculous."

To sum up, the product strength of Extreme Yue 07 is strong enough and the price is sincere enough. If you are interested in this beautiful coupe, you can try to go to the major stores nearby and drive it, and maybe you will get your own answer.

Recently, myna has written many articles introducing domestic operating systems. Deep deepin, Tongxin uos, Kirin v10, and Youqilin are all domestic operating systems with a large number of domestic users. （，）

Many netizens leave messages in the background, asking why Huawei doesn’t make a desktop operating system.After all, Huawei has a strong R&D strength, the HarmonyOS operating system has developed to HarmonyOS 4, and Huawei’s computer business has also done a lot. It should be very reasonable to develop a desktop operating system!

Now, the news of HarmonyOS OS PC version is coming! Recently CEO of Shenzhen Kaihong Digital Industry Development Co., Ltd.When Dr. Wang Chenglu was asked whether there was a PC-side HarmonyOS system when interacting with netizens in Weibo, he replied "Yes"!Wang Chenglu was the president of Huawei’s terminal BG software department and the president of Huawei’s consumer business AI and smart full scene business department, and was regarded as the "father of HarmonyOS".We have reason to believe that the PC version of HarmonyOS is by no means groundless, and it is not far from listing.!

In fact, as early as the release of HarmonyOS OS 1.0, the technology roadmap announced by Huawei indicated that domestic PCs would be supported in 2020.The year of 2020 is a year of rapid development of Xinchuang industry. In this year, the well-known domestic operating systems such as Tongxin uos and Kirin v10 have rapidly expanded their popularity and market share with the help of the policy.. Huawei’s owners in Xinchuanghang mainly provide servers or PC equipment hardware, and have not seen the desktop operating system.

According to the HarmonyOS OS system architecture published by Huawei, the HarmonyOS system will not only run on the mobile phone, but its main purpose is to break down the barriers between different devices, realize the interconnection of devices, and realize the seamless transmission of data and applications.PC operating system is the inevitable result of the continuous development of HarmonyOS operating system.!

At the beginning of this year, some developers tried to transplant the open source HarmonyOS to PC devices, and it worked successfully.

From a business perspective, it is an inevitable choice for Huawei to be a pc operating system. First, the compatible design of pc is reserved at the bottom of HarmonyOS system;Secondly, for the sake of its own business security, Huawei’s PC business also needs to have its own operating system for backup to avoid being stuck in the West.!

Some netizens may ask,What is the difference between Huawei’s HarmonyOS desktop operating system and the current operating systems of Tongxin and Kirin? Isn’t it fighting with each other and wasting research and development resources??

Myna’s personal opinion, this problem should be analyzed by returning to the business model. At present, several domestic operating system manufacturers are making domestic operating systems because of the policy of Xinchuang, and the main service targets are key units such as the government and state-owned enterprises, for the independent control of core fields. The starting point of Huawei’s operating system is to ensure the safety of its own business and ensure that the core foundation affecting its business is in its own hands and will not be blocked by the United States! Everyone’s starting point is to do backup and be self-controllable, but the angle is different.

From another dimension,China’s market is big enough, and any vertical field of mass consumption market is enough for a manufacturer to eat! There are two or three head manufacturers in the operating system field, which is also in line with the logic of marketization.! And there are a large number of markets in South Asia, Africa, South America and so on, which can be the space for the future development of domestic operating systems!

Take the mobile phone industry as an example. At its peak, Huawei failed to eat all the market share. Xiaomi, oppo, vivo and other manufacturers also have their own competitiveness! So you don’t have to worry too much about Huawei becoming a PC operating system and forming a competitive relationship with other operating system vendors.Even if that day does come, consumers will eventually speak with products and ecology, and consumers will vote with their feet.!

It is not spring that outshines others, and a hundred flowers blossom in spring.! Looking forward to the situation of "a hundred schools of thought contend" in domestic operating systems, it will certainly accelerate the development of the hardware and software ecosystem of domestic operating systems!

That’s all for today, please.Click "watching" and "following", thank you for your support.! You can scan the QR code below to pay attention:

Recently, China Petrochemical Lubricant Company held a global conference in Perth, Australia, and officially released ——TULUX T700, a brand-new CK-4 diesel engine oil with the highest global standard for SINOPEC lubricants.

China Petrochemical Lubricating Oil is the first batch of products in the world that have passed the CK-4 certification in american petroleum institute. CK-4 is the latest generation diesel engine oil specification introduced by american petroleum institute. This specification emphasizes the fuel economy and oil change cycle of the product, further improves the requirements for oxidation resistance, wear resistance and shear stability of the product, and reaches more stringent Euro 5 and National 6 emission standards.

At present, China Petrochemical Lubricant has reached cooperation with more than 10 Australian local mining groups, such as McMahon, and has become an important lubricant brand in the Australian market. In view of the characteristics of the Australian market, China Petrochemical Lubricating Oil has given full play to its product and service advantages, continuously promoted network construction and product promotion in key markets, and formed close cooperative relations with local key enterprises such as mining, metallurgy and transportation.

[Editor: Yao Teng]

????On January 29th, the website of Canadian Aspects magazine published an article entitled "The Fallen Ukrainian War" by Chris hedges. The full text is as follows:

????An empire in ultimate decline will quickly enter the next military fiasco from one military fiasco. The Ukrainian conflict-another failed attempt to re-establish American global hegemony-fits this pattern of imperial decline. The danger is that the more terrible the situation looks, the more the United States will escalate the conflict, which may provoke an open confrontation with Russia. If Russia retaliates against the supply and training bases of NATO countries near Ukraine, or uses tactical nuclear weapons, NATO will almost certainly respond by attacking Russian troops. We will start a third world war, which may lead to a nuclear catastrophe.

????American military support for Ukraine began with basic equipment such as ammunition and offensive weapons. However, the US President Joe Biden’s administration quickly crossed several red lines set by itself and provided Ukraine with a large number of deadly war machines.

????Since the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict on February 24, 2022, the US Congress has approved more than $113 billion in aid to Ukraine and its allies, of which $67 billion has been allocated for military expenditures. At present, 28 countries send weapons to Ukraine. Except Australia, Canada and the United States, the rest are in Europe.

????The rapid escalation of cutting-edge military equipment and assistance to Ukraine does not bode well for the NATO alliance. It will take months, if not years, to train Ukrainian troops to operate and coordinate the use of these weapons systems. Tank warfare is a complex operation that needs careful planning. Armored forces must work closely with air power, warships, infantry and artillery units.

????NATO military commanders understand that putting these weapon systems into war will not change the war situation, which is largely determined by the artillery confrontation on hundreds of miles of fronts. At best, it is a deadlock. Purchasing these weapon systems (including training and maintenance costs, a M1 abrams main battle tank costs 10 million US dollars) only increases the profits of weapon manufacturers. The use in Ukraine can make these weapons tested in battlefield conditions, thus making this war a laboratory for weapons manufacturers such as Lockheed Martin. All this is good for NATO and arms companies, but not for Ukraine.

????Officials in Washington demanded support for Ukraine as a bastion of freedom and democracy, and their hysterical cries were a response to the obvious decay and decline of the American Empire. American war crimes, torture, economic decline, social division (including the riots that hit the Congress on January 6, 2021, the poor response to the Covid-19 epidemic, the declining life expectancy of the population and the vicious shooting incidents that caused many casualties) and a series of military failures from Vietnam to Afghanistan are all well known. All this has destroyed America’s global prestige. Since the end of World War II, the coups, political assassinations, election fraud, smear propaganda, extortion, kidnapping, brutal counter-insurgency offensive, American-sanctioned massacres, torture in black jails, proxy war and military intervention all over the world have never led to the establishment of a democratic government. On the contrary, these interventions have killed more than 20 million people and aroused resentment against American imperialism around the world.

????In desperation, the declining empire of the United States injected more and more funds into the war machine.

????The two ruling parties in the United States (the Republican Party and the Democratic Party) rely on campaign funds provided by military enterprises, and also face pressure from weapons manufacturers in local States and regions.

????These military enterprises use the voters in their constituencies to pass a huge military expenditure budget. Politicians are keenly aware that challenging the permanent wartime economy will be attacked as unpatriotic, and it is usually a political suicide.

????French philosopher and social activist Simone Weil wrote in the Iliad, the poem of power: "The soul enslaved by war is in urgent need of liberation, but liberation itself seems to be an extreme and tragic aspect of destruction."

????Facts will prove that the plan to reshape Europe and change the balance of global power by weakening Russia is exactly the same as the failed plan aimed at reshaping the Middle East. The plan is exacerbating the global food crisis and destroying Europe with near double-digit inflation. It once again exposed the incompetence of the United States and the bankruptcy of its ruling oligarchy. As a counterweight to the United States, China, Russian, Indian, Brazilian and Iranian countries are getting rid of the tyranny of the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency, which will cause economic and social disasters in the United States.

????Washington is providing more and more sophisticated weapons systems and billions of dollars in aid, trying to save Ukraine, but more importantly, saving the United States itself, but it will all be in vain.

????